Virginia Polytechnic Institute v. IRS

This record has been reviewed for basic accuracy, correcting any discovered errors.
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Author Term
030965 - - - - April 23, 2004 Kinser 2004

Holding

The primary question in this appeal is whether a reasonably prudent person in the position of the contracting parties would have considered the type of damages claimed in this case to be the natural consequence of a breach of certain agreements dealing with the assignment of intellectual property rights. Answering that question affirmatively, we conclude that the circuit court did not err by admitting evidence of consequential damages. We also conclude that the circuit court did not err in instructing the jury on the issue of waiver.