Radin v. Crestar Bank

This record has been reviewed for basic accuracy, correcting any discovered errors.

Docket No.	Op. Below	Argument	Opinion	Author	Term
940949	- -	- -	April 21, 1995	Stephenson	1995

Citation: Radin v. Crestar Bank, 457 S.E.2d 65, 249 Va. 440, 1995 Va. LEXIS 57, 26 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1196 (1995).

Holding

The sole issue in this appeal is whether an attorney at law is a proper party to sue a bank that refuses to reimburse the attorney’s fiduciary account for a certain check, drawn by the attorney against the account, and honored by the bank over a forged indorsement.