Peyton v. Fields

This record has been reviewed for basic accuracy, correcting any discovered errors.

Docket No.	Op. Below	Argument	Opinion	Author	Term
6166	- -	- -	April 25, 1966	Snead	1966

Citation: Peyton v. Fields, 147 S.E.2d 762, 207 Va. 40, 1966 Va. LEXIS 184 (1966).

Holding

The sole question presented in this appeal is whether the court erred in issuing the writ of habeas corpus on the ground that defendant Fields was not effectively represented by his court-appointed counsel.