Morgan v. Russrand Triangle Associates

This record has been reviewed for basic accuracy, correcting any discovered errors.
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Author Term
042122 - - - - June 9, 2005 Lacy 2005

Holding

In this case, the trial court entered an order nunc pro tunc more than 21 days after the entry of a final order, explaining that the entry of the final order was “inadvertent” and therefore a clerical error capable of correction pursuant to Code § 8.01-428(B). We conclude that Code § 8.01-428(B) did not authorize the trial court to enter its nunc pro tunc order because entry of the final order was not a clerical error and the nunc pro tunc order did not correct the record to reflect the actual acts of the trial court