| Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Author | Term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 042122 | - - | - - | June 9, 2005 | Lacy | 2005 |
Citation: Morgan v. Russrand Triangle Associates, 613 S.E.2d 589, 270 Va. 21, 2005 Va. LEXIS 55 (2005).
Holding
In this case, the trial court entered an order nunc pro tunc more than 21 days after the entry of a final order, explaining that the entry of the final order was “inadvertent” and therefore a clerical error capable of correction pursuant to Code § 8.01-428(B). We conclude that Code § 8.01-428(B) did not authorize the trial court to enter its nunc pro tunc order because entry of the final order was not a clerical error and the nunc pro tunc order did not correct the record to reflect the actual acts of the trial court
