Akers v. James T. Barnes of Washington, DC

This record has been reviewed for basic accuracy, correcting any discovered errors.
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Author Term
811139 - - - - April 27, 1984 Thomas 1984

Holding

The basic issue in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in concluding that a permanent loan commitment, secured by a broker, was in substantial compliance with the terms of the brokerage agreement under which the broker was operating. Appellants contend that the commitment deviated from the brokerage agreement in two significant respects. We agree. Therefore, we will reverse the decision of the trial court and enter final judgment for appellants.