McMillan v. Com.

This record has been reviewed for basic accuracy, correcting any discovered errors.
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Author Term
080622 - - - - January 16, 2009 Hassell 2009

Holding

In this appeal from the Court of Appeals we consider: whether the evidence is sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a defendant possessed cocaine with the intent to distribute in violation of Code § 18.2-248; and whether a circuit court erred by permitting the Commonwealth to introduce in evidence an exhibit that purports to establish that the defendant had a prior felony conviction.