| Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Author | Term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 042158 | - - | - - | June 9, 2005 | Per Curiam | 2005 |
Holding
The issue on appeal is whether Farnsworth’s possession of a firearm in Virginia violated Code § 18.2-308.2 even though the state of West Virginia had restored his civil rights.
The Court of Appeals found that “Farnsworth did not obtain relief under either of these statutory exemptions.”…For the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, we will affirm that court’s judgment.
